3 ms·
It isn't? Are we talking about a different regulation? I quote from the title of 2017/0003/COD COM (2017) 10: Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PA
by lokedhs 9y ago
It isn't? Are we talking about a different regulation?
I quote from the title of 2017/0003/COD
COM (2017) 10:
Proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT
AND OF THE COUNCIL concerning the respect for private
life and the protection of personal data in electronic
communications and repealing Directive 2002/58/EC
(Regulation on Privacy and Electronic Communications)
Note the word "repealing".
- Piskvorrr 9y agoSee, there's this thing called context: the meaning of the word changes through the surrounding words. If there is a word "repealing" in text, this does not usually mean "everything that's related is repealed" - it means exactly what it says on the tin: "repealing Directive 2002/58/EC" - nothing about repealing the existing state-level legislation (to repeat previous context, "It's one ruleset for the whole EU instead one ruleset for each EU state.") My point still stands - you still need to conform to both GDPR and the state-specific legislation.
- lokedhs 9y agoIt may be that I am the one who is misinformed here. My understanding was that 2017/0003/COD was about creating a replacement for 2002/58/EC. I haven't read all the documents, so I could very well be wrong. But assuming that I am right, then a replacement directive would simply cause the states to update their laws and nothing would really change in terms of complexity compared to the situation before.