3 ms·
> There is a reason why responsible journalists wanted to redact that information. Yes: the reason they bring it up is that the issue provides a powerful moral
by laretluval 9y ago
> There is a reason why responsible journalists wanted to redact that information.
Yes: the reason they bring it up is that the issue provides a powerful moralistic cudgel against Assange, a threat to their business model.
As far as I know, there are no documented cases of deaths due to the Wikileaks leaks at issue in the unsubstantiated quote: http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/01/john-mccain/mccain-says-taliban-murdered-people-because-chelse/ http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2017/feb/...
- owebmaster 9y agoAnd you sure can find deaths correlated to mainstream media fake news and social media rumours.
- zzalpha 9y agoYes: the reason they bring it up is that the issue provides a powerful moralistic cudgel against Assange, a threat to their business model. Oh this is just beyond ridiculous. They bring it up because people's lives were put at risk. I won't go so far as to claim people actually died, but that absolutely was a risk and Assange very consciously chose to take that risk. Who cares if the "old media" also happens to see WikiLeaks as a "threat to their business model"? That's literally 100% beside the core point, here, though it's a mighty fine deflection on your part.