> However implication is that you would be happy putting in 50-60 hours You're taking a too narrow a view of it. We never committed anyone to 50-60 hours, that

> However implication is that you would be happy putting in 50-60 hours You're taking a too narrow a view of it. We never committed anyone to 50-60 hours, that's unsustainable. But by _allowing_ it and building a system to manage it, you let folks work what they want and still meet the client needs. Without that flexibility, what happens is what OP describes - folks work more than 40 because you need to / want to, but you don't get compensated for it.