3 ms·
Thanks for those suggestions. Hugo looks particularly awesome. I've been wanting to spin up a blog so I can write tutorials and such. I actually started buildin
by scriptkiddy 9y ago
Thanks for those suggestions. Hugo looks particularly awesome. I've been wanting to spin up a blog so I can write tutorials and such. I actually started building my own web app from scratch for it because I couldn't find a static site generator I actually liked. Hugo, on the other hand, doesn't look like it could be any easier.
- richie5um 9y agoI've used Hugo for a few sites now. There is a bit of a hump at the start - finding a theme you like and customising it to your needs. But after that it is fantastic.
- JoshMnem 9y agoI haven't tried it yet, but this looks interesting too: https://posativ.org/isso/ https://posativ.org/isso/
- scriptkiddy 9y agoThat looks really well done. I don't think I would use it for my static blog simply because I don't really feel like spinning up a separate server just for comments. Part of the appeal of a static site generator for me is not having to administrate a server. I can just throw it up on Github or Gitlab pages and be done with it.
- outsidetheparty 9y agoI used Hugo recently for a one-off brochure site. It was predictable and straightforward and boring, and generally did what I needed it to do without getting in the way. A+++ five stars would recommend.
- scriptkiddy 9y ago> It was predictable and straightforward and boring, and generally did what I needed it to do without getting in the way. This is usually how I know that a library is well put together.
- iorrus 9y agoPelican (https://blog.getpelican.com/ https://blog.getpelican.com/) is also worth a look.