Interesting way to attack post modernism by creating a diatribe in the truest expression of existentialism. If I assume the piece is well written in the sense

Interesting way to attack post modernism by creating a diatribe in the truest expression of existentialism. If I assume the piece is well written in the sense that it gets the authors point across (rather than hastily or sloppily written without respect for the ideas and words that convey them) then I have to wonder which part of the snake is being eaten and which part is doing the eating.