3 ms·
"study shows", and "appears to" are filler. "In mice" is unnecessarily narrow as the original headline doesn't imply any species. "U.S. Drops Bombs" is a perfec
by erikpukinskis 9y ago
"study shows", and "appears to" are filler. "In mice" is unnecessarily narrow as the original headline doesn't imply any species. "U.S. Drops Bombs" is a perfectly fine headline, the location can be specified in the article.
What do you see as the distinction between "restore cognitive function in older individuals" vs "reverses aging process in the brain"?
- exabrial 9y agoDid you actually click the link and read the title? Because that's what it says: "A chronic low dose of Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) restores cognitive function in old mice"