2 ms·
Could you please elaborate why it is a better choice? I don't see how django-beanstalkd could take much less memory than celeryd. If it's about the broker (bean
by asksol 16y ago
Could you please elaborate why it is a better choice? I don't see how django-beanstalkd could take much less memory than celeryd. If it's about the broker (beanstalk), you could have implemented a beanstalk backend for celery as well, then you would have had a tested implementation of the worker part.
Btw, If you would be interested in writing a beanstalkd backend for celery I would be happy to help you out!
- jonasvp 16y agoGood point - I was under the impression that celery _only_ works with an AMQP message broker. Guess I should have read the description more closely before starting on django-beanstalkd. I'm happy with my lightweight model for now but I'll definitely look into celery again, when the need arises.