3 ms·
It's 99% of the same. Green apple and red apple. If you have an existing configuration written in any, it invariably ended up as a pile of hacks, domains and m
by user5994461 9y ago
It's 99% of the same. Green apple and red apple.
If you have an existing configuration written in any, it invariably ended up as a pile of hacks, domains and misredirections that is a pain to rewrite for the other. That makes it hard to change.
Apache has support for some modules, mostly for authentication, that nginx doesn't have.
Old applications, like wordpress, are only supported and documented on Apache.
- dullgiulio 9y ago> Old applications, like wordpress, are only supported and documented on Apache. Wordpress is not old, it is just very badly written.
- aduth 9y ago>Old applications, like wordpress, are only supported and documented on Apache. Not true: https://codex.wordpress.org/Nginx https://codex.wordpress.org/Nginx
- RKearney 9y ago> This page is marked as incomplete. You can help Codex by expanding it. I've been using WordPress on Nginx for almost a decade now, I just found that bit funny given the context.
- davidgerard 9y ago> Old applications, like wordpress, are only supported and documented on Apache. WordPress itself is fine. Many plugins, however, assume Apache (and MySQL).