4 ms·
> People are starting to realize that this 'digital reputation' could limit their opportunities. Thanks to the moral police and keyboard warriors out there nor
by nippples 9y ago
> People are starting to realize that this 'digital reputation' could limit their opportunities.
Thanks to the moral police and keyboard warriors out there normalizing contacting employers over an internet argument.
- creepydata 9y agoI think you meant to say "hiring managers Googling potential employees."
- Bartweiss 9y agoSurely this is a case of "why not both?" Campaigns to get people fired when their online posts are revealed are well-attested from all parts of the political spectrum, and generally come out of doxxing efforts that hiring managers don't undertake. There are even campaigns that boil down to "this person said X, harass/troll their employer so that even if the employer doesn't object to X it becomes too costly to keep them employed". But at the same time, hiring managers have Google and all kinds of tools random harassers don't, like the ability to check criminal records and credit scores. (And there's a great example of an opaque and inaccurate tool governing people's lives - just read about the people sharing a name and birthdate with someone who has bad credit or legal issues!) So yeah, hiring managers with Google. But I wouldn't discount the other issue either, since it can cause people problems even for comments that don't violate any general social standard.
- jgh 9y agoThere are definitely people out there who email screenshots of social media conversations to employers.