3 ms·
Thanks, but I'm not sure that's it. For example, when I look at at [1], I see an apparent contradiction with [2]. It almost seems like they don't know what they
by wfunction 9y ago
Thanks, but I'm not sure that's it. For example, when I look at at [1], I see an apparent contradiction with [2]. It almost seems like they don't know what they're doing, but surely that's because I'm misunderstanding what's going on?
[1] https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/DCP/blob/21c8d3efecd0ceb5fc38dfe8e2c3aa8011ed58cd/COPYING https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/DCP/blob/21c8d3efe...
[2] https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/DCP/blob/496402fa92aa61acfbb871f6faa0988b16d1e2c1/LICENSE https://github.com/NationalSecurityAgency/DCP/blob/496402fa9...
- ganoushoreilly 9y agoIt could also be based upon patent rights, I know that employees get a 50% ownership of all patents, maybe that's part of it?
- ganoushoreilly 9y agoIt could also be based upon patent rights, I know that employees get a 50% ownership of all patents, maybe that's part of it?
- ginreaper 9y agoWell if they are forking or contributing to other software or any type of derivative work, they probably have to retain the original license by law
- wfunction 9y agoThat's not the case at least in the example I just gave though, right?