4 ms·
HEADLINE: faster release cycle DESCRIPTION: In the past I've often ran into stuff in Debian just being too old for my needs. I don't need the bleeding edge, b
by warp 9y ago
HEADLINE: faster release cycle
DESCRIPTION: In the past I've often ran into stuff in Debian just being too old for my needs. I don't need the bleeding edge, but two years is a really long time. I've switched to Ubuntu a few years ago, but not being a fan of Canonical it would be nice if I could come back to Debian.
DISTRIBUTION: stable
ROLE: full stack web developer
- vacri 9y agoUse Debian Unstable on the desktop, and Debian Stable on the server. Despite the name, Unstable is pretty stable - it's just making it clear that you're dealing with relatively fresh packages and these often break as they're not battle-tested. Unstable isn't built from bleeding-edge nightlies, but it's generally up-to-date.