3 ms·
It should be possible to delineate a "core" syntax for Ruby as well and leave the language esoterica to more adventurous practitioners. Why is this not a thing
by Lordarminius 9y ago
It should be possible to delineate a "core" syntax for Ruby as well and leave the language esoterica to more adventurous practitioners.
Why is this not a thing ?
See my previous comment
- owebmaster 9y agoThis is a thing. Most "railers" use a very strict subset of ruby features, although Rails itself uses a lot.
- Lordarminius 9y agoI would disagree. For instance, there are at least two syntaxes in use to describe hashes; parentheses are optionally (and inconsistently) used and so on. Rails suffers from the same issues as does the language
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- zeckalpha 9y agoThis is a thing. Ruby has an ISO standard: https://www.iso.org/standard/59579.html https://www.iso.org/standard/59579.html