Both sites are slightly different in style and quality. The glaring issue with the site you gave me is quality control and a little less attention to UX and det

Both sites are slightly different in style and quality. The glaring issue with the site you gave me is quality control and a little less attention to UX and detail. Additionally, the site you gave me uses almost 100% canned design cliches while my site gets more creative with the interface. These kinds of differences can easily be remedied by greater effort, not greater talent. Additionally most users won't even care or contemplate the difference as both interfaces are well past the "good enough" point. At the fundamental level, the artistic concepts from both designs still relatively simple and literally almost identical: The composition of typography, stock photos and simple geometry.