4 ms·
The 't' vs 'T' has _nothing_ to do with checksums. `Transfer` and `transfer` are two different functions, one creating an "event" (think a signal on the blockc
by NicolaiS 9y ago
The 't' vs 'T' has _nothing_ to do with checksums.
`Transfer` and `transfer` are two different functions, one creating an "event" (think a signal on the blockchain) and the other actually transfering tokens.
The true flaw lies in the reentrant attack on `.send()`
- Laaas 9y agojesus christ, who the fuck would make two identical symbols differentiated by only capitalisation? (Other than these guys obviously)
- lproven 9y agoWhat, you mean apart from every Unix ever? (All right, all right, excluding Mac OS X. But it's weird.)
- kbody 9y agoThere's a big difference between being and actually making use of such anti-patterns. Especially on such a scale.
- jchw 9y agoThat's filesystems, not the OS. There are some extremely good reasons to treat filenames as bags of bytes, which is why Apple got rid of case folding in APFS. Think performance, locale issues, etc. (And before someone says it, yes, of course performance matters for filenames. Every single stat shouldn't need to worry about case folding.)
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- 0x0 9y agoYou can have macOS use case sensitive filesystems (like case sensitive HFS+), and you can have linux use a case insensitive file system (like FAT32)
- pjc50 9y agoIt's surprising that most languages will happily let you do this. Lots of C programs have 'FOO' and 'foo'; not so many will have 'Foo' as well but it's probably more common than you think.
- Laaas 9y agoIMO this is only a problem if they both are the same type, e.g. both are a function, both are a type, both are a variable, both are a special keyword, things like that, because then it's hard to mix them up. If however you can substitute one for the other in code and still have it compile, that would be terrible.
- codedokode 9y agoIt is humans' fault that they cannot choose good name for function, not languages'.
- kefka 9y agoMy comment on checksums was a overall comment of shoddy and embarrassing hacked crap they call Ethereum. They claimed again and again that the code is the contract and vice versa. That was proven not true by the VIP() function. And seriously, if this protocol was given proper due diligence, there would be no reentrant attack on this. But that points back to amateur hour. And a lot of people here have money in ETH and can't come to understand this due to the extreme cognitive dissonance. (The premise of Ethereum really is amazing. Too bad it wasn't given the same diligence as Satoshi gave it.)
- kerkeslager 9y agoI believe you, but this doesn't persuade me that Ethereum isn't "pure amateur hour".
- bpicolo 9y agoTo be fair, bad naming choice