4 ms·
Spot on. RESTful URLs are not to be treated like SEO URLs. But unfortunately most people don't see the difference. One example in the article is especially harm
by rdsubhas 9y ago
Spot on. RESTful URLs are not to be treated like SEO URLs. But unfortunately most people don't see the difference. One example in the article is especially harmful (/students/<id>/courses/physics for querying).
The single best slideshare I've found on REST is Teach a Dog to REST. Old but gold. https://www.slideshare.net/landlessness/teach-a-dog-to-rest https://www.slideshare.net/landlessness/teach-a-dog-to-rest
(And a shameful plug - https://medium.com/@rdsubhas/pitiful-restful-urls-5d576ffccb98 https://medium.com/@rdsubhas/pitiful-restful-urls-5d576ffccb...)
- rimliu 9y ago> RESTful URLs are not to be treated like SEO URLs But it does not hurt to have them human-readable.
- rdsubhas 9y agoIt does hurt. Examples in the article linked above.
- barrkel 9y agoMost web apps (outside of websites themselves, which are a kind of very simple application) aren't HATEOAS, so Roy's thesis has less purchase on their design.