3 ms·
> That sounds hyperbolic because (FACTS) This is what I think I did. > but (affirm that the lady was in fact seriously injured) Something feels wrong about t
by the8472 9y ago
> That sounds hyperbolic because (FACTS)
This is what I think I did.
> but (affirm that the lady was in fact seriously injured)
Something feels wrong about this supposed requirement. I just stated facts. I don't want to insert disclaimers, signalling, agreement or something like that on the surrounding issue. It strikes me as a crazy social ritual.
Note that I have nowhere made a statement on the case in general.
- Mz 9y agoWhat I am trying to suggest here is that people are arguing with you because of the context of your remarks implying that "the woman was not really injured, it was a made-up BS case." You aren't required to do anything in particular. But telling me I am wrong to explain to you how you are coming across is... all kinds of tunnel vision, at best. This is how it looks to me as a minimum. You don't have to care how it looks to me, but you can't tell me I am wrong in my assessment of how it appears to me. And I think I am done with this apparently completely pointless discussion with you.