3 ms·
There was http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 in 2014
by enimodas 9y ago
There was http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 http://www.nature.com/news/the-top-100-papers-1.16224 in 2014
- blt 9y agoWow, I was not expecting so many to be biology and chemistry. Good reminder that computer science isn't the whole world. Nice to see EM, simulated annealing, and Levenberg Marquardt in the bottom 50.
- tgb 9y agoSome fields cite more and publish more than other fields. It doesn't really make any sense to compare citation counts between fields. Moreover, Google's ranking removes review articles and many other things - it purely looks for 'new research' articles. Those get cited much less frequently than reviews or methods papers.