3 ms·
Of course it's not big technical issue, but one wonders why the average setting seems to be that much higher. Probably because it saves some cleaning (toilet br
by mhd 16y ago
Of course it's not big technical issue, but one wonders why the average setting seems to be that much higher. Probably because it saves some cleaning (toilet brushes are also less common here), at the cost of more water wasted.
And as My First American Toilet(tm) was in a hotel, I didn't feel like going all Super Mario on it anyway...
- ars 16y agoHotels don't count, especially the fancy ones. Did you try out any home toilets? (Knock knock - can I look at your toilet sir?) I'm willing to put a ruler in mine, if you will.
- mhd 16y agoBeing caught measuring the water level of toilets would be something I'd never be able to live down. As if Hasselhoff, Nazis and fecal porn aren't enough food for stereotypes... And no, it wasn't a fancy hotel, it was a Holiday Inn Express. Since then, I staid in quite a few company apartments, been invited in a few homes etc. I didn't measure any water levels in Germany (or England, Greece, Italy...), either, so this isn't exactly scientific. But considering that I haven't seen that many toilet brushes here in Jersey (and NYC), you probably need a higher water level. I bet it's different in states where wasting water is worse. And if I remember correctly, Dave Barry wrote quite a bit about water-saving toilets a couple of years back.
- ars 16y ago> seen that many toilet brushes I don't think that's representative. All the houses I've been in had one. It's possible people just put them where they are not very visible.