4 ms·
This would be great to run a security camera still feed through. It could completely eliminate false positives.
by accountyaccount 9y ago
This would be great to run a security camera still feed through. It could completely eliminate false positives.
- kyrra 9y agoI wonder if Nest is using it with their new cam[0], as it has person alerts now (with face detection). [0] https://nest.com/camera/meet-nest-cam-iq/ https://nest.com/camera/meet-nest-cam-iq/
- halflings 9y agoThey would probably use FaceNet[0] then, if they only want to detect faces, as that should give better results. [0] https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03832 https://arxiv.org/abs/1503.03832
- odbol 9y agoExcept they wouldn't be able to detect people wearing masks, which is probably an important thing for a security camera to do...
- spullara 9y agoIn the research blog entry they do say they are using it in the new Nest cams. https://research.googleblog.com/2017/06/supercharge-your-computer-vision-models.html https://research.googleblog.com/2017/06/supercharge-your-com...
- jd20 9y agoWe still have a ways to go, to completely eliminating false positives, but these tools will help us get there. For example, you can recognize different types of objects now but we still need to figure out which are meaningful or not (like a person or animal vs a tree blowing in the wind). Even certain classes, some are benign while others or not, for example pedestrians walking by the front of my house versus a guy wearing ski mask fiddling with my window, they're both people, but their behavior is what separates them.
- accountyaccount 9y agoEven a confidence level would go a long way. If I get a notification that says "motion detected" I have to look at it, but if it said "motion detected, person with 75% confidence" that suddenly becomes much more valuable.
- KGIII 9y agoDigital cameras pick up different parts of the spectrum. My curiosity is raised. Could that be used to increase confidence levels?