5 ms·
Why does the first table have 71 clicks, but the second has 20? While the cost looks like it might be $31.88 in the second table, but only $24.83 in the first o
by riffer 16y ago
Why does the first table have 71 clicks, but the second has 20? While the cost looks like it might be $31.88 in the second table, but only $24.83 in the first one? I ask because the re-tweet experiment got 73 clicks, and the relative performance is potentially interesting.
http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2010/05/twitter-rt-test-results.html http://www.gabrielweinberg.com/blog/2010/05/twitter-rt-test-...
- epi0Bauqu 16y agoThe spend was $24.83. The second picture was a possible spend for one campaign, but since most were denied then it didn't actually spend that money.