2 ms·
Heh... I knew this looked familiar. Per the note at the end of the article, it should probably be tagged "(2015)". Previous discussion under a slightly differ
by jcl 9y ago
Heh... I knew this looked familiar. Per the note at the end of the article, it should probably be tagged "(2015)". Previous discussion under a slightly different title:
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10686217 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=10686217