For this gigantic assumption of a comment to have any merit whatsoever you would have to show that: 1/ Poor people actually shop at amazon in a significant way

For this gigantic assumption of a comment to have any merit whatsoever you would have to show that: 1/ Poor people actually shop at amazon in a significant way 2/ The massive job and wage losses Amazon causes in the poor community are insignificant compared to the "wage gains" #1 would imply. I suspect both assumptions are false. This sounds like a comment from someone in a bubble like SF where lots of people have the disposable income to buy everything online. People in the rest of the country live very differently.