I think both directions are basically going to the same destination. I believe we should worry more about the "artificial human" than about "artificial intelli

I think both directions are basically going to the same destination. I believe we should worry more about the "artificial human" than about "artificial intelligence". To get to the artificial human there are several paths, biological (with genetic engineering), cybernetics (gradual replacement of body parts with non-organic artefacts), robotics (non-organic from the start) and software (brain emulation). I believe all those paths eventually lead to the same kind of difficulties in predicting what kind of world they would bring.