3 ms·
Is that actually advisable? The same attitude made people stick with Windows XP or Firefox 3.5, don't you think?
by _Microft 9y ago
Is that actually advisable? The same attitude made people stick with Windows XP or Firefox 3.5, don't you think?
- grimgrin 9y agoIt's in the same spirit as: https://greasyfork.org https://greasyfork.org https://openuserjs.org https://openuserjs.org ^ Both can be used with Greasemonkey (Firefox) or Tampermonkey (Chrome) https://userstyles.org https://userstyles.org (used with Stylish)
- jamescostian 9y agoWhile I'm not a fan of the project, I do think that comparison isn't fair. XP and outdated browsers give you a much higher chance of malware, because MS isn't really putting out XP security patches and browsers release security patches in newer versions, hoping everyone will upgrade to them. Meanwhile, this project is essentially 16 lines of JS. Even the README takes up more space. Reading through the lines of JS, I don't see how they will make you vulnerable at all.