3 ms·
That doesn't change the fact that Apple is ignoring the published standard. If that's what they want to do, then they should call it a proprietary format and l
by visural 16y ago
That doesn't change the fact that Apple is ignoring the published standard.
If that's what they want to do, then they should call it a proprietary format and let people choose whether they want to use it, not have their cake and eat it too.
- bonaldi 16y agoGood point. Does the standard insist on the specified fonts, or are clients allowed to overrule them according to user prefs? If the latter, a fix is just an additional "book default" entry in the fonts menu. (If the former, that's a lousy standard, right there)
- gte910h 16y agoThe standard doesn't do anything about specific fonts. The standard DOES have facilities to set a font family, i.e. serif, sans-serif, fixed-width, etc. It throws off formatting for a lot of books if you screw with that sort of thing. Which is what Apple is doing.