3 ms·
It will probably come from the opposite direction, i.e., integrating more and more cybernetics into our bodies until at some point we're essentially only our br
by Santosh83 9y ago
It will probably come from the opposite direction, i.e., integrating more and more cybernetics into our bodies until at some point we're essentially only our brains (biologically). Whether something non-biological can show emergent properties that the brain has remains to be seen.
In any case even AI completely indistinguishable from ourselves is likely only to be as much of a threat as our children are. Everything depends on how it is managed. Apocalptic scenarios generally can only happen in a tightly connected, online society with no offline fallback mechanisms for control. If we are that careless/stupid, then perhaps AI taking over our systems (and hence us) is not so bad after all...?
AI needs creative intelligence, ability to learn and adapt the very process by which it learns, as well as links to the physical world enabling it to control and perpetuate its existence. The entire process is in our (human) control. Until the very end.
The other direction is frankly more scary. Augmented human beings and other existing living beings. That is much more prone to go haywire and pose a threat.
- manyoso 9y agoThis involves speculating on a race between two other highly speculative technical research projects: 1) When AI is able to mimic humans in terms of creativity, passion, emotions, etc 2) When we are able to biologically integrate compute resources into the human body Future scenarios might be vastly different depending on which of these two technical research projects wins the race.
- grondilu 9y agoI think both directions are basically going to the same destination. I believe we should worry more about the "artificial human" than about "artificial intelligence". To get to the artificial human there are several paths, biological (with genetic engineering), cybernetics (gradual replacement of body parts with non-organic artefacts), robotics (non-organic from the start) and software (brain emulation). I believe all those paths eventually lead to the same kind of difficulties in predicting what kind of world they would bring.