4 ms·
A few years ago, he wrote an article explaining that computers could never be good at poker, because that required bluffing, a skill exclusive to humans.
by petters 9y ago
A few years ago, he wrote an article explaining that computers could never be good at poker, because that required bluffing, a skill exclusive to humans.
- colmvp 9y agoI wonder, couldn't one program a computer to record video and audio of the players you are up against, provide some probabilities of hand strength based on stance, mannerisms, facial expressions, and voice, and add that information into the mix with a betting AI?
- bko 9y agoThat's not even necessary. Using just logic, probabilities and computation, research scientists have been able to beat very strong poker players head to head. http://www.wired.com/2017/02/libratus http://www.wired.com/2017/02/libratus
- bitL 9y agoAffectiva API, and there is your poker-face sensing AI...
- HONEST_ANNIE 9y agoHe is wrong but he has a point. Computers are currently good at head's up. The ultimate test is playing in full table tournament against players with very uneven skillet. If there is one good player in the table, he will be able to recognize and exploit differences.
- sqeaky 9y agoI agree with you. It is hard to get a computer to perform well many different skillets. Currently, I can only get a really good omellete and pancakes when the skillet dimensions are precisely known. EDIT - Jokes of this calibre deserve downvotes.