This is honestly terrifying. As a citizen of a state that increasingly tends to call "terrorism" any non-passive dissent I can't help but substitute the word "d

This is honestly terrifying. As a citizen of a state that increasingly tends to call "terrorism" any non-passive dissent I can't help but substitute the word "dissent" for the "terrorism" in the article. "If we previously removed a propaganda video from the doubters of The Great Leader, we can work to prevent other accounts from uploading the same video to our site" and such. Or, to put it into terms closer to the demographic majority of HN, "we have also recently started to experiment with using AI to understand text that might be undermining the authority of the Oval office". Given that Facebook collects data from a ton of sources besides facebook.com (even your CC data), it's literally a Big Brother scenario. Big "AI-powered" Brother without any oversight or responsibility.