2 ms·
Summary of the post: SHA-3 is slow, but check out these other recently proposed parallelized variants of Keccak, they could be much faster.
by sigmar 9y ago
Summary of the post: SHA-3 is slow, but check out these other recently proposed parallelized variants of Keccak, they could be much faster.
- espadrine 9y agoI read it this way: - On hardware, SHA3 is faster than every other contender in the competition. - On software, K12 is so fast that the bottleneck will not be its computation.