4 ms·
That is almost true. However, transferring value between cryptos is trivial and at least Monero and zcash allow you to tumble your transactions and essentially
by cl0rkster 9y ago
That is almost true. However, transferring value between cryptos is trivial and at least Monero and zcash allow you to tumble your transactions and essentially completely disguise the inputs and outputs from anyone trying to search the public ledger.
- wmf 9y agoBut do the latest regulations essentially ban Monero and ZCash?
- Phlarp 9y agoOnly to the extent to which any government can ban math.
- RcouF1uZ4gsC 9y agoBut, they can keep the math as only math and prevent it from being used for real world goods and services.
- vidarh 9y agoThe difference here being that the next step can easily be to impose requirements on merchants to do checks, and require them to refuse to honour transactions where payments comes from known tumblers etc. In the UK, if you apply for a mortgage now, for example, your solicitor and mortgage provider will ask questions about where your deposit is coming from, and require documentation if it looks like it's not from regular savings or the like. Today that is manual and paper based, and so only viable for large purchases like a house, and additional documentation is only requested if there are indications of fairly large payments in your last 6 months of bank statements. My ex was bitten by this when buying a house recently, as she received part of her dads estate via bank transfer from abroad, and had to chase down documentation from the executor to demonstrate that it was a legitimate source. With crypto coins they could require execution of automated analysis of far more transactions going far further back in time. Won't stop it from being used for crime, and won't prevent people from finding ways of making transactions anonymous, but the point is they don't need to "ban math" because that maths intersects with physical actions taken by humans on a regular basis.