2 ms·
> I actually prefer fast and loose with most terms. Ironically, I find it leads to simpler conversations. You mean simplistic conversations right? The problem
by sridca 9y ago
> I actually prefer fast and loose with most terms. Ironically, I find it leads to simpler conversations.
You mean simplistic conversations right?
The problem with being fast and loose with terminology is that it lacks precision; and with lack of precision comes ambiguity and misinterpretation, which beats the whole point of good communication.
- taeric 9y agoSorta. I'm reminded of the point Feynman made about keeping everything as "layman" in explanation as possible. His point was basically not to hide behind jargon and highly specific terms in trying to explain something. So, if communication is hinged on highly specific meanings of words, the odds go way up that someone will not actually hear what you think you are saying. Instead, keep conversations high level and do not rely on the specific meanings. It requires more thought from the listeners, in some ways, but it actually relies on less pre existing knowledge from the listeners. It is tempting to think you have narrowed your audience down to non laymen. This is often an incorrect assumption, though. And in writing, this can go out completely. There is a place for highly specific and very precise language. It is usually best along side the non-specific language.