3 ms·
The new type system is a superset of the older ones. You can still write your own specialized error-prone repetitive containers for each and every type by hand
by TheDong 9y ago
The new type system is a superset of the older ones.
You can still write your own specialized error-prone repetitive containers for each and every type by hand.
Yet, once a language has generics, people don't use the old way even though it's still possible to.
Perhaps that's because it has no place when there's a replacement which is less error-prone, less repetitive, more usable, and can be implemented once in a library and used forever.
- pdimitar 9y agoI don't disagree. The risk is there. It's just that for me and others in this thread it's at an acceptable level. Outside of that, agreed.