2 ms·
Well, you've shifted it for sure, but I still think this can improve the situation: - It's residential ISPs that are unreasonably tracking metadata, rather tha
by matthewmacleod 9y ago
Well, you've shifted it for sure, but I still think this can improve the situation:
- It's residential ISPs that are unreasonably tracking metadata, rather than infrastructure providers.
- Even if that no longer applies, it's possible to use a VPN in a friendlier jurisdiction.
- The details of what you are doing are more obfuscated. If you're sharing a VPN, that has obvious benefits. If you use an anonymous VPN, even better.
Ultimately there will always be some data about your internet use available to a determined adversary – it's ultimately just a side-effect of wanting to send data across a network. But I'm personally more interested in opting out of the dragnet-style metadata collection that's being played with in the UK, so keeping my traffic out of sight of my ISP is a benefit.
- zurn 9y agoResidential ISP's often belong to same conglomerates that own web properties, ad networks etc. So they can correlate last-mile VPN traffic with web traffic by correlating IP packet sizes/timings.
- matthewmacleod 9y agoI'm not really convinced that this is the case, or that they could practically do that.
- zurn 9y agoI would also guess it's not widely happening currently. But it's certainly feasille and technially easy, and may become lucrative to do if "VPN" use becomes more widespread or other motives enter the picture.