> Gawker isn't some tabloid. Yes, they basically are. Just in case you are confused why your comment is getting downvoted, it's because they absolutely should

> Gawker isn't some tabloid. Yes, they basically are. Just in case you are confused why your comment is getting downvoted, it's because they absolutely should not be considered a valid news source. They [1]. Should [2]. Not [3]. Now I'm sure you're getting ready to bring up other outlets again, which may I remind you was not the point of my original comment or this one. We're talking about Gawker and only Gawker's reputation. Other outlets have other issues I'm sure, but it has been proven time and time again that Gawker cannot be trusted. [1] https://www.cnet.com/news/ceas-take-on-ces-gizmodo-prank-banned/ https://www.cnet.com/news/ceas-take-on-ces-gizmodo-prank-ban... [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollea_v._Gawker https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bollea_v._Gawker [3] http://www.businessinsider.com/past-controversy-at-gawker-media-2016-3 http://www.businessinsider.com/past-controversy-at-gawker-me...