3 ms·
Agreed, confirming that there is no public evidence which hard links Lazarus to DPRK. Just want everyone to know the facts.
by cottsak 9y ago
Agreed, confirming that there is no public evidence which hard links Lazarus to DPRK. Just want everyone to know the facts.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- openasocket 9y agoWhat would a "hard link" be? A signed confession from the head of the DPRK military? Under the circumstances, barring classified intelligence (like the NSA may have), we are as sure as we can be.
- quakeguy 9y agoSo we are unsure.
- openasocket 9y agoOut of curiosity, what evidence would convince you?
- tracked24x7 9y agoCollin Powell got quite a lot of tonnage I mean mileage out of a cartoon drawing. Just draw him a picture.
- boomboomsubban 9y agoAbsolute certainty that this would not be used as an excuse to launch military attacks would be a start.
- Sacho 9y agoI don't know - isn't this an issue with the erosion of trust towards the administration and "domain experts", something they can only blame themselves for? More importantly, why do you want people to be convinced of this? What difference does it make? If it is used as some sort of justification for (more?) economic sanctions or an attack, then I don't think any realistic hacking attempt is going to be enough. If you just want this attributed to NK, what is the point? If people don't know enough about the situation to be sure, and they have no trust in any authority on the subject, then the way forward would be for an authority to build up trust with those people and then claim it is attributed to NK.
- mirimir 9y agoWho is "we" here? There are many levels of bullshit between knowledgeable folk at NSA and me. Far too many for me to be sure of anything.
- mirimir 9y agoPeople are discounting, I think, the lulz factor in pretending to be working for NK. Just sayin'.