Eh, I’ve gotten somewhat confusing type errors from mixing precedence levels in Haskell, but no bugs that I can recall. I’d like it if the levels were named ins

Eh, I’ve gotten somewhat confusing type errors from mixing precedence levels in Haskell, but no bugs that I can recall. I’d like it if the levels were named instead of numbered, though—I have a hunch that the majority of operators fall into a family like “additive”, “multiplicative”, &c. People have experimented with relative precedence levels (and I believe Perl6 does this?) where you can say “this is lower-precedence than that” and you have to use parentheses to disambiguate expressions that mix operators unrelated by that partial order.