How impactful spending $ is should be measured by the outcomes and whether there was a cheaper/faster way to spend $ to achieve a similar outcome with a similar

How impactful spending $ is should be measured by the outcomes and whether there was a cheaper/faster way to spend $ to achieve a similar outcome with a similar level of risk, not by whether achieving that outcome required spending $ on necessary compliance. Re neurotoxicity - neurotoxicity should definitely be explored, though more important seems to be does it negatively impact someones life - are the less happy, less smart, etc. https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/10report/chap02e.pdf https://pubs.niaaa.nih.gov/publications/10report/chap02e.pdf > Studies clearly indicate that alcohol is neurotoxic Though apparently alcohol has minimal consequences in safe doses. Same thing appears to be true of MDMA. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3053129/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3053129/ > In a study designed to minimize limitations found in many prior investigations, we failed to demonstrate marked residual cognitive effects in ecstasy users.