3 ms·
I believe this is just what would have been 9.10.3 just rebranded. They wanted the major number to track the FreeBSD version number. https://forums.freenas.org
by psadauskas 9y ago
I believe this is just what would have been 9.10.3 just rebranded. They wanted the major number to track the FreeBSD version number.
https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/this-week-in-freenas-4-21-2017.53798/ https://forums.freenas.org/index.php?threads/this-week-in-fr...
Renaming to 11.0 - As many of you know, we’ve been hard at work on what was to become 9.10.3 in the next few weeks. As part of this update, we have also bumped the base OS version to FreeBSD stable/11. This is a significant enough update that we wanted to take this opportunity to return to a saner form of versioning that more closely follows the underlying OS version. Moving forward you’ll be seeing releases like 11.0, 11.0-U1 (Update #1), 11.1 and so forth, eventually moving to 12.0 once we rebase on FreeBSD 12 (still a couple years off).
- metalliqaz 9y agoThanks, this explains it perfectly.
- walterbell 9y agoFreeNAS 9.x did not include virtualization. If this was just a 9.x.y release, why would it include major architectural changes like virtualization?
- ac29 9y agoAt least FreeNas 9.10 does, via iohyve/bhyve [0]. I installed a Ubuntu Server image using it the other day and it worked flawlessly. [0] Docs are a little spartan, but google searches got me up and running a virtualized linux image in less than 15 minutes. https://doc.freenas.org/9.10/jails.html#using-iohyve https://doc.freenas.org/9.10/jails.html#using-iohyve