9 ms·
> preserving access to the toolchain which operates trivially with files was worth the additional performance overhead of working with the files Sounds like th
by troutaway123 9y ago
> preserving access to the toolchain which operates trivially with files was worth the additional performance overhead of working with the files
Sounds like they're OK with that.
In any case, couldn't you avoid the kernel trips with some dylib foolery (assuming the toolchain is dynamically linked)?
- firethief 9y agoSo: store the files in a database, expose them via FUSE, bypass FUSE and access the database?
- troutaway123 9y agoYep ;D