4 ms·

¿Porque no los dos? Store the files in a database but expose them via FUSE.

• pjc50 9y ago
  That gives you the time cost of a filesystem plus the time cost of a database plus an extra round-trip in and out of kernel space.
  • troutaway123 9y ago
    > preserving access to the toolchain which operates trivially with files was worth the additional performance overhead of working with the files Sounds like they're OK with that. In any case, couldn't you avoid the kernel trips with some dylib foolery (assuming the toolchain is dynamically linked)?
    • firethief 9y ago
      So: store the files in a database, expose them via FUSE, bypass FUSE and access the database?
      • troutaway123 9y ago
        Yep ;D
• octetta 9y ago
  ...or v9fs... but the overhead might make the whole exercise pointless.