3 ms·
In order of importance: 1) Don't use a really bad password like 'password'. This one is the most important because it might allow an attacker to compromise yo
by bradleyjg 9y ago
In order of importance:
1) Don't use a really bad password like 'password'.
This one is the most important because it might allow an attacker to compromise your accounts online--that is without compromising the site itself.
2) Use a different password for each site.
This one is important because you don't want a compromise of smallvillelittleleague.org, which stores its passwords in plaintext, to mean that an attacker now has access to your banking accounts.
3) Use 2-factor on high importance / risk websites.
4) Use very strong passwords everywhere (i.e. long randomly generated).
If you've done 1-3 above the scenario where having a very strong password over a medium strength password is of concrete benefit is fairly narrow. It requires that the attacker get a website's password hashes, that the hash used be a fairly weak one, but that the website not be totally owned (because if it was then there's no additional benefit to having your site specific password).
All IMO of course.
- strictnein 9y ago> 4) Use very strong passwords everywhere (i.e. long randomly generated). You can also go the route of using passwords like: MyEmailIsFromGmail! or HackerNews?MoreLikeSlackerNews
- EvgeniyZh 9y agoNote that HackerNews?MoreLikeSlackerNews has much less entropy than j-9yh`qw#j54-JIR$
- strictnein 9y agoSure, but having to type that in will cause an aneurysm.
- EvgeniyZh 9y agoThat's why password managers exist