5 ms·

You don't have enough funding here to pay labour to go around and plant seeds. This is a cheaper and better alternative.

JumpCrisscross 9y ago
> This is a cheaper and better alternative Flying a drone in India require permits from multriple authorities [1] Their import is also highly regulated [2]. It may be cheaper to throw a couple bucks at a few thousand people than go through the license Raj. At the very least, it would be faster and more predictable. [1] http://m.hindustantimes.com/india/us-citizen-arrested-for-photographing-khajuraho-temples-with-drone/story-uPMYnJdhcG5Y8Edh2ar2xO.html http://m.hindustantimes.com/india/us-citizen-arrested-for-ph... [2] http://mashable.com/2016/03/02/india-drones-duties/#ib1XDcXpNuqC http://mashable.com/2016/03/02/india-drones-duties/#ib1XDcXp...
- naravara 9y ago
  >It may be cheaper to throw a couple bucks at a few thousand people than go through the license Raj. At the very least, it would be faster and more predictable. They're just going to trample over the landscape they're supposed to be foresting. You also can't verify and trust them to actually go out there and plant things rather than just throwing their whole bag in the nearest trash can and coming back with an empty sack demanding payment.
  - jerf 9y ago
    "They're just going to trample over the landscape they're supposed to be foresting." Really? Do you have a mental image of these people locking arms like a search party and marching around the forest deliberately stomping everything they find into a thin green paste or something? It is not actually that difficult for some people to walk into a forest without killing everything they see, plant some trees, and come back. The Evil of Man (TM) does not actually extend to laser beams of death coming out his eyes and striking down all living things within visual range. I can't help but read this as just being contrarian for the sake of contrarianness, because this objection (being raised by some others in this discussion too) is fundamentally deeply silly.
    - naravara 9y ago
      >Really? Do you have a mental image of these people locking arms like a search party and marching around the forest deliberately stomping everything they find into a thin green paste or something? It is not actually that difficult for some people to walk into a forest without killing everything they see, plant some trees, and come back. The Evil of Man (TM) does not actually extend to laser beams of death coming out his eyes and striking down all living things within visual range. You understand that large numbers of people walking over an area necessarily involves trampling over the ground right? This effort requires repeated plantings over a long time. Random people you pick up off the street who you're paying a pittance are not going to be invested in your actual goal, just the proximal goal of getting paid to do the thing.
      - jerf 9y ago
        Have you actually spent time in forests that are well-traveled by people? Forests are not constructed out of finely-spun cotton candy or something that melts away at the touch of rain or the slightest touch. Again, it is not that hard to walk into a forest, plant some trees, and walk back out without killing everything you see. People manage to do this all the time, even at scale. Perhaps you are thinking of the desert ecosystem, which in many places is sensitive enough to do serious damage to with just a footstep? I really can't imagine that you've spent very much time in forests if you think they are literally so delicate that they can't handle traffic for the purposes of putting more trees in them. You are aware that animals tend to live in them, too, right? It's not all just The Evil of Man (TM).
        naravara 9y ago
        These aren't forests yet. These are rocky hills with little other than grasses and scrub brush on them. The water table is low from overuse and insanely polluted besides. The rains are irregular and salinization and soil erosion are both huge problems. We're not talking about a robust ecosystem here, we're talking about rebuilding an extremely unhealthy biome. Having thousands of people stomping around in that back-country isn't going to do it any favors. This is why national parks have trails and fences to keep people from treading on the more sensitive parts and require wilderness permits before you get to go backcountry camping. Backcountry doesn't stay backcountry when it has to carry too many people. People piss. They shit. They spit and smoke and litter. When you're paying a junk wage to random people off the street who aren't bought into your mission they will do all of these things and nobody will be policing them. It's sounding like you've never actually tried to coordinate large groups of people to do anything before. Especially if they're under-educated and not paid well, they really tend not to exercise much diligence or care.

JumpCrisscross 9y ago

> This is a cheaper and better alternative Flying a drone in India require permits from multriple authorities [1] Their import is also highly regulated [2]. It may be cheaper to throw a couple bucks at a few thousand people than go through the license Raj. At the very least, it would be faster and more predictable. [1] http://m.hindustantimes.com/india/us-citizen-arrested-for-photographing-khajuraho-temples-with-drone/story-uPMYnJdhcG5Y8Edh2ar2xO.html http://m.hindustantimes.com/india/us-citizen-arrested-for-ph... [2] http://mashable.com/2016/03/02/india-drones-duties/#ib1XDcXpNuqC http://mashable.com/2016/03/02/india-drones-duties/#ib1XDcXp...

naravara 9y ago
>It may be cheaper to throw a couple bucks at a few thousand people than go through the license Raj. At the very least, it would be faster and more predictable. They're just going to trample over the landscape they're supposed to be foresting. You also can't verify and trust them to actually go out there and plant things rather than just throwing their whole bag in the nearest trash can and coming back with an empty sack demanding payment.
- jerf 9y ago
  "They're just going to trample over the landscape they're supposed to be foresting." Really? Do you have a mental image of these people locking arms like a search party and marching around the forest deliberately stomping everything they find into a thin green paste or something? It is not actually that difficult for some people to walk into a forest without killing everything they see, plant some trees, and come back. The Evil of Man (TM) does not actually extend to laser beams of death coming out his eyes and striking down all living things within visual range. I can't help but read this as just being contrarian for the sake of contrarianness, because this objection (being raised by some others in this discussion too) is fundamentally deeply silly.
  - naravara 9y ago
    >Really? Do you have a mental image of these people locking arms like a search party and marching around the forest deliberately stomping everything they find into a thin green paste or something? It is not actually that difficult for some people to walk into a forest without killing everything they see, plant some trees, and come back. The Evil of Man (TM) does not actually extend to laser beams of death coming out his eyes and striking down all living things within visual range. You understand that large numbers of people walking over an area necessarily involves trampling over the ground right? This effort requires repeated plantings over a long time. Random people you pick up off the street who you're paying a pittance are not going to be invested in your actual goal, just the proximal goal of getting paid to do the thing.
    - jerf 9y ago
      Have you actually spent time in forests that are well-traveled by people? Forests are not constructed out of finely-spun cotton candy or something that melts away at the touch of rain or the slightest touch. Again, it is not that hard to walk into a forest, plant some trees, and walk back out without killing everything you see. People manage to do this all the time, even at scale. Perhaps you are thinking of the desert ecosystem, which in many places is sensitive enough to do serious damage to with just a footstep? I really can't imagine that you've spent very much time in forests if you think they are literally so delicate that they can't handle traffic for the purposes of putting more trees in them. You are aware that animals tend to live in them, too, right? It's not all just The Evil of Man (TM).
      - naravara 9y ago
        These aren't forests yet. These are rocky hills with little other than grasses and scrub brush on them. The water table is low from overuse and insanely polluted besides. The rains are irregular and salinization and soil erosion are both huge problems. We're not talking about a robust ecosystem here, we're talking about rebuilding an extremely unhealthy biome. Having thousands of people stomping around in that back-country isn't going to do it any favors. This is why national parks have trails and fences to keep people from treading on the more sensitive parts and require wilderness permits before you get to go backcountry camping. Backcountry doesn't stay backcountry when it has to carry too many people. People piss. They shit. They spit and smoke and litter. When you're paying a junk wage to random people off the street who aren't bought into your mission they will do all of these things and nobody will be policing them. It's sounding like you've never actually tried to coordinate large groups of people to do anything before. Especially if they're under-educated and not paid well, they really tend not to exercise much diligence or care.