4 ms·
Right! The issue is management sweeping the allegations under the rug. A lot of the hate towards Uber in these threads seems to be about the number of allegati
by barsonme 9y ago
Right! The issue is management sweeping the allegations under the rug.
A lot of the hate towards Uber in these threads seems to be about the number of allegations, not that they were swept under the rug (in my opinion at least–I don't read HN religiously).
That, I think, leads us to where we are right now: a comment thread that's basically about "what's the minimum number of sexual harassments can occur before a company has a 'problem'?"
I'm not trying to pick on you, so I apologize if I come across that way.
- rajathagasthya 9y ago> A lot of the hate towards Uber in these threads seems to be about the number of allegations, not that they were swept under the rug If you have a large number of harassment incidents, it's completely relevant to question if there is a culture problem in the company (a problem which was denied outright by the parent commenter), and IMO this is what HN seems to be doing. Especially when you have accounts of Uber having a "frat" culture trickling down from the CEO and some senior executives condoning (this is probably too strong a word) such behavior. My point is Uber isn't being treated unfairly by any means.