3 ms·
The future of education might be plain text, but not for the reasons mentioned in the article. Also, I think something can be the future of XYZ if it solves the
by Sreyanth 9y ago
The future of education might be plain text, but not for the reasons mentioned in the article. Also, I think something can be the future of XYZ if it solves the problems XYZ face currently.
The current content for education is good, but is definitely bandwidth-heavy and is tough to maintain. But dropping to plain text will force us let go a few things that otherwise make learning more effective.
I think HTML (or a WYSIWYG style editors - that seem like plain text, but can be powerful with images, videos, animations when required) also does the same thing like plain text,
- it is always compatible (I give it to you that it takes effort to run hifi stuff on browsers, but still better than plain text).
- is easy to mix and match
- is easy to maintain (thanks to many editors)
- is light weight (not compared with plain text of course)
- is forward compatible (not possible when all browsers decided to not support HTML in its current state).
I appreciate the thought behind bringing this up. I think writing something in plain English, which can then be turned into some super cool learning material that runs everywhere would be awesome. It helps both in solving the issues mentioned in the article at the same time keeps learning effective.
- confounded 9y agoDisagree. HTML is a fine output format, but one that can always be generated from plain text. HTML is a poor storage format for the editable 'raw' content itself. Images, videos, and animations can all be done in markdown -- they're just references to files. Even something as small as the the MathJax CDN getting retired means that I have old HTML notes which are now 'dead'. If I don't have the markdown/rmarkdown source for them, realistically, they're just not coming back.
- collinmanderson 9y ago> If I don't have the markdown/rmarkdown source for them, realistically, they're just not coming back. That's why I try to use HTML as the universal storage. It's not friendly to edit by hand, but with a basic, limited editor it's wonderful.
- microcolonel 9y agoThe problem is the lack of agreement on how to apply styles. Some tools do inline, some build stylesheets which use name mangling to format pretty names for CSS classes.