3 ms·

>Background checks put unnecessary strain on honest citizens. I live in New York state. I'm an honest citizen, and I've never been in any more trouble than a b

>Background checks put unnecessary strain on honest citizens. I live in New York state. I'm an honest citizen, and I've never been in any more trouble than a broken tail light. It took 11 months for my pistol permit to be approved, and yet there was no "strain". It was literally something I applied for and forgot about until the sheriff called to do my in-home interview, which is also required here to get your permit. Somehow it wasn't the end of the world, because I, like most people, don't actually have a "need" for guns. The only thing that bothered me about the wait is that it doesn't apply to every state. And no, home defense isn't a need; it's an excuse. Guns are fun. Dangerous, but fun, and that's why people get them in 2017. Any other reason you or others give is a rationalization based on anecdotes of home invasions that will probably never occur in your lifetime.

15155 9y ago
> It took 11 months Maybe it should take 11 months to register to vote? > I, like most people, don't actually have a "need" for guns That's awesome for you, truly! The government is notoriously bad at making subjective decisions for the population at large, however, which is why staunch regulation is met with such resistance. > home defense isn't a need; it's an excuse I need to defend my home: I am not physically capable, nor should I be required to take the risk of engaging a violent, felonious aggressor or his posse with my bare hands. I can't afford to live in a great area, so burglaries are quite common. Do I have less of a right to defend myself because I am poor? -- Simply put: the Second Amendment grants me the right to keep and bear a firearm, as affirmed and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. I don't need any excuse or rationalization: jurists much smarter than I have done that for society at large.

15155 9y ago

> It took 11 months Maybe it should take 11 months to register to vote? > I, like most people, don't actually have a "need" for guns That's awesome for you, truly! The government is notoriously bad at making subjective decisions for the population at large, however, which is why staunch regulation is met with such resistance. > home defense isn't a need; it's an excuse I need to defend my home: I am not physically capable, nor should I be required to take the risk of engaging a violent, felonious aggressor or his posse with my bare hands. I can't afford to live in a great area, so burglaries are quite common. Do I have less of a right to defend myself because I am poor? -- Simply put: the Second Amendment grants me the right to keep and bear a firearm, as affirmed and reaffirmed by the Supreme Court of the United States of America. I don't need any excuse or rationalization: jurists much smarter than I have done that for society at large.