4 ms·
Water is less scary than uranium. I agree with you, but it seems to be futile to convince people because there's just more movies about the harm of radiation th
by fusiongyro 9y ago
Water is less scary than uranium. I agree with you, but it seems to be futile to convince people because there's just more movies about the harm of radiation than deaths by flooding. They keep rebuilding New Orleans and living in coastal Florida too.
- mseebach 9y agoThere's a chicken-and-egg situation here -- people are never going to get comfortable with nuclear while politicians are leading the FUD-charge.
- x0x0 9y agoYet we keep being told, "Oh no, it's safe this time. Really." and then Fukushima happens. Not to mention cleanup costs that started at $50B are now estimated to surpass $0.2T. I would be surprised if they don't double a couple more times before all is said and done, and that's fractions of a trillion dollars.
- mseebach 9y agoBecause compared to the cost of climate change, really is was safe this time, even after Fukushima. And a substantial fraction of the cost is due to extreme, very likely unwarranted caution, motivated by an unreasonable level of, exactly, fear. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/13/is-it-safe-to-dump-fukushima-waste-into-the-sea https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/apr/13/is-it-sa...
- fusiongyro 9y agoThe point I'm trying to make is that every system has risks and externalities, but for some reason they only get added up when we're talking about nuclear.