3 ms·
I've never been able to figure out what people mean by "tags" and what the benefits are, perhaps someone can enlighten me? I feel like the only problem with st
by prewett 9y ago
I've never been able to figure out what people mean by "tags" and what the benefits are, perhaps someone can enlighten me?
I feel like the only problem with standard hierarchical file systems is that sometimes you want files to show up in multiple places. I think this is only a subset of files, typically "media." A photograph or a song often has multiple categorizations. However, a lot of things, like my tax documents, source code, Word documents, and notes typically only have one place they need to go to. It seems like symlinks or hard links are an already-existing solution; other than lack of great options on managing them, how do tags improve this?
As far as I can tell, tagsistant does have hierarchical tags, so it isn't doing away with hierarchy, which is good. One problem with some tag systems (like Gmail's original) is that under "notes" I have "lectures," "stuff I want to remember," "things like list of books I want to read," "temporary." If I'm looking for photos, I really don't want to see a bunch of notes tags.
- cJ0th 9y agoI think tags only prove beneficial when you have a very well defined purpose. More concrete, I think the number of tags has to be fairly limited and the logic behind the tagging scheme should stay consistent forever. One example of tags being superior to links is that you can search files with logical queries. For instance, a family member asks you to send them a good portrait of you for whatever reason. You may want to make sure that it is somewhat recent. However, you're willing to take one that is two years old if it looks better. Then you could search for: #portrait & #me & #2017 & #2016 & #2015