4 ms·
The 2009 Twitpocalypse concerned overflow of 31-bit precision. Twitter has not yet hit 53-bits for raw number of Tweets, in fact, they passed 32-bits in 2014 an
by gilgoomesh 9y ago
The 2009 Twitpocalypse concerned overflow of 31-bit precision. Twitter has not yet hit 53-bits for raw number of Tweets, in fact, they passed 32-bits in 2014 and might not have reached 33-bits, yet.
Moving to strings for Javascript was really just safety planning for the future since:
> Given the current allocation rate, they'll probably never overflow Javascript's precision nor get anywhere near the 64-bit integer space.
https://twittercommunity.com/t/discussion-for-moving-to-64-bit-twitter-user-ids/9890/2 https://twittercommunity.com/t/discussion-for-moving-to-64-b...
- spullara 9y agoThat discussion is about user IDs, not tweet IDs. Tweet ID from today: 875423039323688960 Number of bits of precision necessary to represent it exactly: 60 Overflowed 53-bit precision long long ago. You can read about it here: https://dev.twitter.com/overview/api/twitter-ids-json-and-snowflake https://dev.twitter.com/overview/api/twitter-ids-json-and-sn...