3 ms·
To be fair, it makes sense to offer five distinct feature sets as five different JS files; just pick the ones you need and concatenate them in production. I fa
by TrevorBurnham 16y ago
To be fair, it makes sense to offer five distinct feature sets as five different JS files; just pick the ones you need and concatenate them in production.
I favor the Sass route as well, but that's not going to give me, say, rounded corners in IE8. I'd need to use JS to accomplish that. When you say the examples look different in the latest non-beta versions of major browsers, what do you mean specifically?
- samdk 16y agoThere are two examples listed: http://ecsstender.org/ http://ecsstender.org/ and http://ecsstender.org/demos/spoon/ http://ecsstender.org/demos/spoon/. On Firefox 3.6, they both hang (for several seconds) as the JS loads/comes into effect (and the "stop unresponsive script" box comes up). After it does finally load, the first looks fine, but the second doesn't animate smoothly on hover, and a scrollbar appears when you hover over the box, which really shouldn't happen. On Chrome, they both work fine, but are missing drop shadows. On IE8, the first loads fine, but not of the special effects (rounded corners, drop shadows) actually works. The second...well, I think that's best described with a screenshot: http://i.imgur.com/ZjPNs.jpg http://i.imgur.com/ZjPNs.jpg (there's no hover effect at all). All browsers are fully up-to-date. Unless I'm missing something, this really isn't even at all functional.
- TrevorBurnham 16y agoOuch. Thanks for taking the time to test.