2 ms·
Using JSBlocker here. no content. Just doing some futile effort to show web developers that to get some basic text without javascript is cool. Of course, do wha
by bwidlar 9y ago
Using JSBlocker here. no content.
Just doing some futile effort to show web developers
that to get some basic text without javascript is cool.
Of course, do whatever you want with your site.
Maybe I was a bit rude.
- dylz 9y agoNoscript+Firefox here. There's full content - the entire page has a JS-disabled full text of every post wrapped in a large <noscript> block. Does jsblocker completely wipe out noscript tags or something?
- 520794 9y agoNot rude if it was correct. But this blogspot website works fine without javascript. Also, for the ones that do not, it is easy to dump any blogger (blogspot) website to "basic text" using netcat, etc. No javascript needed. The problem must be in the blocker you are using or something else. imo, blockers that work via the browser are not the optimal way to retrieve basic text. You are still using a massive browser which you do not need to retrieve a page of basic text, which can easily be accomplished by a smaller, more simple program. Using a small tcp client like netcat and saving the page to a (temporary) file is one way to do it. If you then want to view the basic text by opening the file in a large, complex, ad-sponsored, web browser that is optimized for running javascript and automatically connecting to third party servers, you can do that. Or you could use something simpler. You have a choice.